Vegetable shop selling fruit and fruit shop selling vegetables
In the Q&A section of everyone is a product manager community, there is such a question: Why do vegetable stores sell fruits, but the stores that sell fruits don't sell vegetables?
There are many answers to this question, and many of them have different thinking angles, and these answers seem to be real answers, which can lead to the results of this phenomenon.
Some people believe that fruit is a vertical subdivision of vegetables and is independent from the market segment of the vegetable market. Naturally, they will not go back to sell vegetables, and the definition of the vegetable phone number list market originally includes fruit.
Some people believe that vegetables are a necessity for people's lives, but fruits are not. Based on the practice of high frequency driving low frequency, fruit is introduced to achieve an increase in the unit price of customers. Fruit itself is low frequency, and it is difficult to drive the sales of vegetables under low frequency.
There are also views that the unit price of fruit is higher than that of vegetables, and the vegetable owner can sell fruit to increase income, but the cost-effectiveness of selling fruit and vegetables is not high.
There are many other points of view, which are not listed here. In fact, we can also think about the answers that we agree with.
Why are there so many answers to the same question, and the gap between each answer is so great that I even feel that this is the answer to a different question.
Perhaps our entry point is different, which leads to different results.
The above three viewpoints are the answers obtained from three different perspectives: affiliation, consumption frequency and profit.